Independent cooling intelligence

Choose AI cooling with evidence, not sales claims.

Compare architectures, products, suppliers, and real deployments. See what is proven, what is only announced, and what still needs to be verified before you buy.

THERMAL PATH / REFERENCEGB300 reference architecture
Illustrative
AI RACK142 kW
LIQUID CAPTURE~80%
SUPPLYWARM WATER
RETURNHEAT OUT
CDU
FLOW ACTIVEPUMPS N+1
Technology loop Facility heat rejectionView source record
133records reviewed in 90 days
59reviewed claims with duty points
57records with outside evidence
0records changed this week

What this database is for

Move from a cooling question to a defensible decision.

DataCenterChill turns scattered supplier pages, announcements, and project evidence into records that can be checked and compared.

01

Explore what exists

Suppliers, products, equipment categories, and architectures, each one connected to the others rather than listed alone.

Browse the records
02

Compare on stated claims

Put two to four records side by side with the figure as published, the duty point it assumes, and the source behind it.

Open the workspace
03

Verify what is built

Separate operating sites from pilots, orders, plans, and press releases, with the source beside every claim.

Review deployments
04

Download the evidence

Normalized specification, deployment, and ownership tables as CSV and JSON, with a data dictionary and the sources behind each row.

Open the datasets

Coverage, not volume

How much of this database is decision-grade.

A thin record is still in the graph and still searchable here, but it stays out of search engines until it carries evidence. These are the figures we hold ourselves to.

Records
133
Structured, connected, and dated.
Meeting the evidence gate
105
Complete enough, sourced enough, and recently enough reviewed to be indexable.
Independently sourced
57
At least one source outside the supplier's own material.
Reviewed claims
59
Normalized figures an editor has read against the source, with their duty points.

Check the work: every published edit is in the change feed, the underlying tables are in datasets, the standard behind them is the methodology, and anything wrong can be corrected with a source.

What changed this week · 0 records

Reviewed changes, not a headline feed.

Full change feed

Live comparison

Coolant distribution units, as published.

Open this comparison
UnitRated capacityDuty pointSources
Accelsius NeuCool IR8080 kWNo duty point stated2
Accelsius MR250250 kWNo duty point stated1
CoolIT CHx20002,000 kWNo duty point stated1

Capacity figures are supplier-reported unless the record names independent evidence, and a capacity without a duty point cannot be compared with one that has it.

Market pulse

Cooling intelligence, not recycled headlines.

All intelligence

Technology library

Follow the heat path.

Explore every architecture

Company database

Know who can cool what.

Browse 36 companies
Architecture decision / 09 min

Most-read comparison

Direct liquid cooling vs. immersion cooling

How much heat each one captures, which servers you can use, what maintenance becomes, what the building needs, and how many suppliers you would actually have to choose from.

Compare architectures
Decision factorDirect-to-chipImmersion
Keeps standard racksYesNo
Heat captured in liquidTargetedNear-total
Server vendor supportBroadSelective
MaintenanceFamiliarSpecialized

Still researching

Keep reading. Everything here is free.

Every record is open, sourced, and dated. No account, no paywall, no sales call. Come back when the project is real.

Have a project

Get a supplier shortlist built for it.

Tell us the capacity, location, and timing once. We reply within one working day with suppliers that fit. Free for buyers, and no supplier sees your details until you approve the introduction.